Maps have incredible transformative powers, particularly in terms of spatial analysis, visualisation and in decision-making. As maps have become ever-more ubiquitous in both our professional and private lives, have the new tools and approaches changed the way we respond to and engage with spatial data?
Many disciplines are increasingly leveraging mapping within their own toolkits and practice, though most have over-looked the rich theoretical and historical basis of the discipline of cartography, creating solutions they believe to be new and unique when in fact previous examples can often be found originating decades earlier. Such is the result of the sound-bite and out-sourced knowledge of the modern world, where people happily don the suit of other disciplines, but are not interested in it’s historical and theoretical depths.
Is our relationship with mapping different now? To what extent is this a reflection of technology or new forms of representation and graphic communication? Are we seeing the evolution of new paradigms for the spatial and projective disciplines that realise a change for mapping within transdisciplinary modes of practice? These are questions that inform his personal research.
Jason is also a member of Estranged Space, a group of spatial practitioners who create site-responsive interventions within spaces which are contested, unsettling, peripheral and displaced—exploring notions of perception, (re)interpretation, narrative and place.